WeaveReads

Reading, Writing, and Everything In Between

  • Book Review — Chasing the Boogeyman

    “Chasing the Boogeyman” was one of those reads where I kept pausing just to sit with how WELL it was working for me.

    Going right into it, I didn’t know how I’d feel about the author’s introduction — those can be hit or miss for me — but I actually really appreciated the insight into Richard Chizmar’s background and what pushed him to write this story. There are a couple of lines in there that have stuck with me, especially the idea that some things in life (and death) aren’t meant to be understood. That sentiment becomes the backbone of the entire book.

    The early town history dump immediately made me think of Stephen King (who’d have thunk?) — from the suspicious fire at The Black Hole (a ramshackle jazz club that absolutely feels like a cousin to The Black Spot from “IT”), to the way childhood, evil, and location are all tied together. And while King tends to weave his history slowly through the narrative, Chizmar lays it out upfront. Normally that would bother me, but here it actually works, especially paired with his explanation that towns have two faces: the public one, and the secret one. Once that clicked, I loved the setup.

    The blend of true crime elements with the narrative is incredibly effective. The factual details, police interrogations, and real-feeling documentation ground everything in a way that constantly made me forget I was reading fiction. The crime scene photos and author-provided images added so much atmosphere; it’s unsettling in the best way, like you’re flipping through a folder of evidence instead of pages in a book.

    I also really loved the sharp tonal shifts between sections: one moment you’re deep in a police investigation, the next you’re drifting through Chizmar’s lush, almost poetic description of a Fourth of July parade. That contrast makes the violence and dread feel even more intrusive, like horror bleeding into moments that should be safe.

    What really got me, though, was the nostalgia. Chizmar captures childhood memories so vividly — the naïve loyalty between friends, the belief that those friendships are forever, that soft, safe warmth that only exists when you don’t know just how dark and cold the world can get. It made the horror hit harder, because I could FEEL what was being threatened.

    There’s a particular line about the killer’s white mask “floating” closer in the darkness that genuinely made me shudder. That single word made the Boogeyman feel less human and more supernatural, otherworldly. Inevitable. Unstoppable.

    And the reveal? My jaw actually dropped. No spoilers, but I truly did not see it coming. Which I suppose was the point; that in keeping it from his limited perspective, Chizmar presented a narrative that was real, emotional, and truly frightening.

    Overall, this felt like true crime amplified: nonfiction textures blended with sensationalized fiction, photos, interviews, and deeply personal reflection. Chizmar didn’t just tell me a story, he dropped me into the town and left me there, forced to watch everything unfold as one of the townspeople.

  • Book Review — Julia **SPOILERS**

    Going into “Julia” with basically zero context other than “it’s a retelling of 1984” (a book I honestly haven’t touched since middle school) probably wasn’t the smartest move, but here we are. I’ll be real: I felt a little slow to the draw at first. It opens with a pretty heavy dump of names, roles, and information, and I spent a chunk of the beginning just trying to orient myself and figure out who was who and why I should care. Once it settled, though, it was ON.

    Because holy sh*t — that moment with the baby. I genuinely did not see that coming. Was it a miscarriage? A purposeful abortion? Some faceless culprit leaving it for Julia to find? That whole sequence completely knocked the wind out of me. From then on, this books became one of those reads where taking notes almost feels pointless because everything is so mentally involving. So much is constantly happening that I just wanted to keep going and find out what fresh horror was waiting on the next page. (And, refreshingly, a different type of horror than I’m used to!)

    The way Julia is interrogated after reporting the baby is infuriating. The immediate suspicion, the way she’s treated as guilty no matter how much she denies involvement — it perfectly captures that “guilty until proven innocent” nightmare of a society. And then somehow… Vicky (the aforementioned culprit) is just fine? Or at least not exiled, silencer, or erased? Even if her protection comes from engaging with someone higher up, the lack of consequences felt bizarre and confusing. The rules of this society are so murky: where is the cutoff for punishment, exactly? Who gets spared and why?

    Julia’s whole arc with O’Brien stressed me out to no end. She keeps getting summoned to meet him and puts it off or delegates, and all I could think was: isn’t that more suspicious than just going and getting it over with? I didn’t fully understand the hesitation beyond his Inner Party status, but everything about him felt suffocating and wrong in a very intentional way. Same with the class dynamics; Julia getting attacked by people lower than the Outer Party and then having to hide it confused me. She’s technically above them, so why is she the one afraid of the consequences? The power structure seems deliberately skewed and disorienting, which I get is the point, but it still left me frustrated.

    Also: the way this book handled women made my blood boil, which again, is very much the point. Even in a society where everyone is oppressed, women are still treated worse. The constant predation. The lack of agency. Winston insisting Julia accompany him places she doesn’t want to go. I just cannot find it in myself to like a single man in this book. Let the women breathe. Let them THRIVE. Vicky wanting to be a nurse and still being surrounded by creep-o men made me want to scream.

    Julia’s skewed understanding of sex and relationships is fascinating and horrifying. Her willingness to treat herself as disposable, to sleep with men in her department as a form of resistance or information-gathering, is such a bleak reflection on what this society has done to her sense of self. I did love seeing Vicky finally speak more freely and call Julia out — especially the moment she points out “we’re they.” That realization hit hard. You can’t blame an abstract enemy when you’re actively participating in the machine. Vicky wanting to go, to leave entirely, felt like one of the few moments of clarity in the whole book.

    The torture scenes were brutal. Like vividly, disturbingly descriptive. Hard to read because I could picture every second of it. And then… They just let her go? Maybe I’m just used to the brutality of “The Handmaid’s Tale,” but that’s where my frustration really peaked. What does this government even want? They torture people for information they already have, threaten to destroy them completely, and release them more-or-less intact. (They do start being considered as “unhumans,” and treated as such.) And Julia being pregnant through all that? There is absolutely no believable world where that pregnancy survives the physical abuse, shock treatments, and sheer stress of it all. Which makes it even more baffling that the book made such a huge deal about Julia specifically being chosen to carry “Big Brother’s” baby. Why choose her just to nearly kill her anyway? The logic completely breaks down for me there. (Though I guess maybe it could be considered the plot’s scapegoat: the only reason Julia was able to make it out alive was because of a visibly worn pregnancy badge.)

    That said, there are moments that absolutely shine. “The feeling was always beneath the surface: a threatening-promising rage that contained the germ of an idea.” Incredible line. And when Julia finally lets herself hate — when we finally get a raging woman instead of a compliant one — it’s deeply satisfying. Harriet’s line perfectly encapsulates my thoughts while reading this: “all men are rotten.”

    The ending reveal with the Free Brotherhood being just another Big Brother was grim but effective. The illusion of choice was one of the strongest themes here; no matter where they turn, allegiance to some higher, controlling power is required. Different name, same overall power-grab. That parallel really struck me, especially with how the initiation mirrors the very system they’re supposedly escaping.

    Overall, “Julia” is a strong, frustrating, disturbing, and thought-provoking read. It made me uncomfortable, confused, and angry — often all at the same time — which I think is exactly what it’s meant to do. While I had a lot of questions and moments of genuine irritation, the narrative itself is powerful and memorable. I’m landing at a solid 3 out of 5 stars.

  • Book Review — Growing Things **SPOILERS**

    Paul Tremblay’s short story anthology “Growing Things” starts strong and immediately reminds me why his writing always takes a second to fully settle into my brain. Seeing as there were 19 stories in this collection, my review will focus on my favorites, but my overall rating is for the book as a whole.

    The title story “Growing Things” is quiet in that deeply unsettling way that Tremblay does so well. In just a few pages, Merry casually mentions that she barely remembers her mother, who ran off when she was four, yet clearly remembers a preacher who had been intermittently in her life around the same time. That detail stuck with me more than anything else. It felt like such a sharp observation about memory and absence; how we assume the people that are supposed to be there will always be there, so we don’t bother etching their memory in our minds until it’s too late. Marjorie, meanwhile, fully embraces the role of unsettling older sister, drifting from eerie to almost comatose in a way that’s genuinely uncomfortable to see unfold.

    I loved the concept here: un unstoppable, unknown force of “growing things” that can punch through manmade structures and and render humanity useless. But I won’t lie, I walked away feeling a little lost. I couldn’t tell if the story was smarter than me or if I just wanted a little more payoff. The ambiguity is intentional, obviously, but it still felt anticlimactic for how strong the premise was.

    “Swim Wants to Know if it’s as Bad as Swim Thinks” surprised me, because I usually don’t vibe with first-person POV in horror (or any genre, really). I don’t like being shoved directly into the situation. But this one works, because it isn’t about immersion — it’s about a mind fracture in real time. The way the narrator’s thoughts loop, diminish, contradict themselves, and rewrite reality is genuinely fascinating. It becomes clear pretty quickly that she did something horrible involving her daughter, lost custody, and isn’t allowed anywhere near her… and the story absolutely dangles that question in front of you like bait. WHAT did she do??? Oh, and apparently there are monsters coming out of the ocean, but that’s… lesser news, somehow. The narrator is deeply unreliable, manipulative, and still somehow calculating despite nearly unraveling, and while the ending twist comes fast, it was worth it. Expected, but effective.

    “Something About Birds” fully sent me into WHAT IS HAPPENING territory. I don’t care how popular or respected Wheatley is, if someone gifted me a bird head, we’d be done. The moment that thing either grew or got replaced by some disturbingly realistic, fleshy bird mask, I was locked in. And then suddenly we’re dealing with what feels like a full-blown bird cult — torture, ritual, sacrifice — possibly all because of a poem? Or because Wheatley initiated something? I have so many unanswered questions, and while that’s kind of the point, it left me spinning.

    “Nineteen Snapshots of Dennisport” might be one of my favorites purely because of its structure. A narrator describing numbered photographs, revealing bits of their life through frozen moments, immediately worked for me. I was fully convinced this was headed toward an affair or a crime-of-passion moment, but the twist caught me off guard (in a good way!) I still wanted more (I always do with short stories), but I loved that it went somewhere darker and colder, especially with the narrator quietly setting up revenge.

    And then there’s “A Haunted House is a Wheel Upon Which Some Are Broken,” which I adored. An interactive story?? Immediate yes. I stopped taking notes because I was having too much fun. The repetition works beautifully here, and by the end, it becomes this really powerful meditation on grief, loss, and the slow painful movement towards acceptance.

    All of the stories orbit similar themes: fractured minds, unreliable narrators, quiet apocalypses, and the monsters we agree to live with. Some landed better than others, some left me frustrated, and a few genuinely impressed me. Overall this ended up being a 3.5-star read for me (rounded up for 4 stars), for being messy, confusing, thought-provoking, and just very Tremblay.

  • Book Review — The Crash

    I hate giving one star reviews, but this book nearly ended up on my DNF list… and I hardly EVER do that! I didn’t take notes while reading — partly because I was flying through it, and partly because I was annoyed — so this review is entirely based on the lingering frustration I’m still experiencing after finishing.

    First of all, the amnesia trope in the beginning. I know trauma can cause memory issues, and being drugged certainly complicates things, but the way it’s used here just feels like a lazy plot device. She forgets everything… Until she suddenly remembers given the slightest nudge? I don’t know; it didn’t surprise me, it didn’t feel earned, and just made the twist land flat — even though the underlying event (her assault) is genuinely awful.

    And then there’s Jackson. Absolutely not. The second I found out who he worked for and what he’s been covering up, he would have been dead to me. This book tries so hard to swing him into a redemption arc, like we’re supposed to root for them to end up together, or feel conflicted about his behavior. Nope! He swept Simon’s crimes under the rug for years. Even after he “comes to his senses,” he’s still using hidden crimes as leverage for Tegan’s child support? What else has he buried that we’ll never find out? I don’t care what the narrative was trying to convince me of. Jackson sucks, and I’ll die on that hill.

    Speaking of questionable characters: TEGAN NEVER TELLS THE POLICE SHE WAS HELD CAPTIVE FOR FOUR DAYS. W H A T????? Just because Polly saved her in the hospital, and Hank saved her from the initial car crash, does not erase the basement imprisonment! One good deed does not a good person make. And now Polly and Hank are foster parents barely a year later?? I feel for and sympathize with a couples’ infertility issues, I truly do. But almost killing someone and stealing their baby requires more than just waking up one day and realizing “Oh, maybe I went a little crazy there.” She should be in a hospital at the very least getting some mental help, and Hank should be arrested as an accomplice.

    As a main character, Tegan was also really hard to root for. She has no survival instincts, she gives up the second things get inconvenient, and the victim mentality never lets up. One specific part at the end stands out to me the most: she spends the majority of the story repeating like a mantra that she has no family left, her brother is the only one in her life she can trust, yadda yadda. So that’s supposed to make it that much more heartbreaking and surprising when he tries to kill her in the hospital. But she also makes a comment while in the hospital that her room is FILLED with gifts and flowers from everyone in her life. It sounds like she has quite a bit more support than she let on. I wanted to care, I really did. But by the end I was more so rooting for the book to end, not for her to escape.

    All that said, this is just proof that Frieda McFadden is not the author for me. And that’s totally fine! I’d categorize this as “flight reading”: if I were stuck somewhere for several hours with nothing else, this would keep me awake. Barely.

  • Book Review — IT

    Finishing IT feels like such a personal victory that I’m still kind of floating 24 hours later (haha get it?) I didn’t take notes while reading (like I usually do) partly because I  wanted to let it break my slump naturally, and partly because I’ve hyped this book up to myself for years and I wanted the experience to go smoothly. I took my time, I really lived in Derry while reading it, and even now I feel like I can close my eyes and sketch a map of the town from memory. King’s world-building is unreal; he makes you feel like knowing the pharmacist’s mother’s maiden name is important, like the sidewalks and Barrens are places you’ve walked your whole life.

    And somewhere in the middle of cosmic, otherworldly horror… Richie Tozier snatched my heart and refused to give it back. There’s just something about him in the book that hits so much harder than any adaptation. He’s loud and annoying and funny and loyal in a way that feels heartbreakingly human. Finn Wolfhard honestly did a phenomenal job capturing that chaotic sweetness — frankly more on the chaotic side, let’s be real — his Richie is probably the closest anyone has gotten to the version living in my head.

    One of the biggest surprises, though, was how deeply the Losers love Bill. The movies don’t portray it half as intensely. In the book, their loyalty to him is bone-deep and completely unquestioning. There was an instant understanding that he was their leader intended to take them to victory, or die trying. Eddie literally thinks about dying for him without hesitation (RIP Kaspbrak). None of them doubt his leadership, not even 27 years later when they’ve forgotten almost everything else. It’s such a beautiful, innocent kind of reverence that only childhood friendships can produce, and reading it genuinely made my heart swell. (This is also one of the only books where I highlighted my favorite quotes.)

    Speaking of beautiful: Ben and Beverly. I was not prepared for how soft and sincere Ben’s love would be on the page. It’s not obsessive or dramatic; it’s patient, understanding, accepting, and lifelong. He admires her bravery, he loves her without expecting anything from her, and somehow that persistence feels more romantic than any grand gesture could. It’s sweet in the way in childhood crushes are sweet, but also enduring in a way adult love rarely is.

    And then there are the moments where I’m reminded why King is the King — namely the part where Richie and Mike have their vision during the Ritual of Chüd, where they witness the Coming of It. The scale of it, the mythology, that mix of cosmic dread and awe… I genuinely got chills. King has this talent for taking something that shouldn’t be scary, and making it terrifying by the end.

    The thing that surprised me most, though, was how nostalgic it made me. Not just for childhood, but for the intensity of childhood friendship, the way those bonds feel fateful and never-ending. The Losers are tied together in a way that feels like spiritual, like destiny, and King writes their connection so well that I genuinely missed being a kid while reading.

    I’ve watched the movies for as long as I can remember — Tim Curry’s Pennywise was practically a family member in my childhood home — so reading the book felt like stepping into the “real” version of a story I’ve loved my whole life. I do wish I had taken the time to tab things or jot notes down so I could have done a real, polished review, but honestly? It just gives me even more of a reason to reread it. And if even one person tells me to do a dissertation-level breakdown comparing the miniseries, the Skarsgård movies, and the book, I will absolutely do it, Powerpoint and all.

    For now though, finishing IT feels like a major Reading Bucket List item that I’ve just ticked off. I’m proud of myself, I’m out of my slump, and now I can finally get back into my ever-growing TBR list.

  • Book Review — The Waste Lands: Dark Tower III

    I’ll start by saying: I love the “Argument” section at the beginning. Whoever told King to include a little summary deserves a medal. For people with the memory span of a goldfish (hi, it’s me), it’s a lifesaver.

    Roland stepping into the role of “Teacher Roland” feels so right — patient when he needs to be, stone-cold serious the rest of the time, but with flashes of humor that make him human again. And then there’s Mir — a seventy-foot cyborg bear acting as a boss battle? Sure, why not. I definitely didn’t have “mechanical bear guardian” on my Dark Tower bingo card.

    We get more background into Eddie and Henry’s relationship, which I actually really liked. Their codependency, the guilt, and the twisted way Henry dragged Henry down because he couldn’t stand being outshone — it’s sad and very human. Eddie’s growth since then might be my favorite thing about this series. You really feel him evolving from this smart-mouthed addict into someone reliable, sharp, and quietly clever.

    Jake’s re-entry was what finally pulled me out of my reading slump. I’ll be honest: the first half of the book dragged for me. It’s not that it was BAD — there’s a lot of solid world-building —  but I just wanted to get moving toward the Tower already. When we switched over to Jake’s perspective and got that “split timeline” confusion explained from his point of view, though, I was back in. His riddles, the dream clues, the references to the Turtle and the Beam; all that weird cosmic foreshadowing had me hooked again.

    The whole “Jake and Roland mind-split thing” finally resolving itself felt like the payoff I’d been waiting for. That scene where Roland saves Jake and Susannah fights off the demon is chaotic perfection. I didn’t even pause to take notes. And once the quartet is reunited, the dynamic between them starts clicking in a way that finally feels like the series is taking shape.

    Roland’s leadership here — the constant “we’ll talk when the time is right” attitude — is equal parts infuriating and fascinating. Eddie’s frustration mirrors my own; I wanted to SHAKE Roland half the time. But I also get it. He’s the gunslinger for a reason, and King makes sure you see both the wisdom and the weariness behind that.

    The stop in River Crossing (with the old people) was surprisingly moving. It’s slow, sure, but it gave me perspective, not only on how legendary Roland’s kind once was, but how easily the slightest comfort could derail their mission. The world is decaying, and there’s something eerie about kindness existing in a place that’s already half-dead.

    And then… Blaine the Mono. A riddle-loving ghost train. Honestly, I can’t decide if I love him or want to throw my Nook across the room. The buildup is great though — Lud feels grimy, tense, post-apocalyptic in the best way, and I could practically hear that mechanical heartbeat of the drums echoing through the city.

    Also, let it be known: if anything happens to Oy, I’m starting a personal crusade.

    In the end, The Wastelands didn’t hit quite as hard as The Drawing of the Three for me. The pacing lagged in places, but when it was good, it was REALLY good. The character development is top-tier, and the atmosphere of Lud and the final chapters are exactly what I wanted from this weird, sprawling fantasy. I just needed to get there faster.

  • “I think Davey is the killer,” I said about ten pages in, and honestly, I wasn’t far off to suspect him right from the beginning. From the start, Davey just gives off that energy. He’s timid, indecisive, and almost painfully passive; not exactly the sort of guy who makes you feel confident in his ability to handle a conspiracy or even a simple argument.

    Most of the characters got on my nerves at one point or another. Davey’s parents literally bought them a house, and she wants to move? I’d need at least three serial killers and a demonic cult active in the neighborhood before I’d even consider giving up a free house. Davey’s father isn’t helping though; the man’s a complete jerk. There is not a single branch on this family tree that doesn’t reek of dysfunction.

    At first, I wasn’t sure what was real and what was completely fabricated by Davey — the whole “Hellfire Club” thing felt as if it might have been made up, and Nora’s narration doesn’t help — she’s unreliable, inconsistent, and constantly brushing off her husband’s exaggerations. When Dick Dart suddenly kidnaps her from a police station FULL of cops, I had to put the book down. There’s suspension of disbelief, and then there’s that.

    That said, something about the story kept pulling me back. Maybe it was the lingering question of whether Nora or Davey were actually behind everything. There’s a chaotic charm in wanting to see just how bad things could get, and there were a few genuine twists that I didn’t see coming. By the end, I was begrudgingly impressed that the story stuck the landing, even considering the parts that dragged on longer than necessary.

    Still, my biggest issue is Nora’s seemingly blind trust in Davey. We barely get any sense of their relationship before the chaos starts, so her loyalty feels forced and unrealistic. Combine that with the sometimes sluggish pacing, and “The Hellfire Club” ends up being a mixed bag: a few clever surprises buried under too many unlikeable characters and implausible moments.

    It’s not bad, just not great — it’s the kind of story you NEED to finish just to confirm your earlier suspicions were correct.

  • Stephen King wastes no time pulling us back into Roland’s story. Where “The Gunslinger” left off on a bleak beach, “The Drawing of the Three” throws us straight into chaos with spider-lobster creatures tearing into Roland and taking two of his fingers and a toe. It’s fast-paced, violent, and immediately makes you worry about his survival — especially once we discover the “lobstrosities” had poisoned him. I was also struck by how quickly King removes the man in black from the picture; he’s still around in Roland’s thoughts, but not the looming villain I expected. (After seeing what the man in black was capable of in “The Stand,” I had high expectations!) Instead, the book becomes about who Roland draws into his world and how their stories intertwine with his.

    The idea of a door appearing where it shouldn’t — just sitting in the middle of nowhere — is one of the creepiest images for me. Roland finding one of these “doors to nowhere” sent shivers down my spine. Each door brings a new character into the fold, and I love the way King handles it. Eddie Dean, for example, is a character I fell for almost instantly. He’s young, reckless, and battling heroin addiction, but there’s such a sweetness to him, and his acceptance of Roland’s intrusion into his mind was both hilarious and heartbreaking. Watching him go from panicking to rolling with the absurdity of it felt so human. His love for Odetta grows fast, but it’s also endearing — he’s loyal, dependable, and stronger than he realizes. The scene of him learning his brother Henry had been murdered, only to be shown Henry’s severed head, absolutely destroyed me. I cried alongside him.

    Odetta/Detta is a fascinating addition. The split personalities are handled in King’s signature, over-the-top way, though I’ll admit the inner monologues written for Detta veered into territory that felt uncomfortably cringey and dated. Still, the idea of battling herself and eventually becoming Susannah was a powerful transformation.

    The cyclical nature of this series really intrigues me — Jack Mort’s actions created Odetta/Detta, just as it was alluded that he may have been “The Pusher,” the man who killed Jake in the first installment, “The Gunslinger.”By killing Mort while taking charge of his body, Roland might have unraveled Jake’s fate, and it leaves me wondering just how tangled these timelines really are. Multidimensional storylines always make my brain spin, but in a way that makes me eager to keep reading.

    I also loved those little King touches where small details ripple outward in time. For example, a cop who once noticed something off about Roland doesn’t connect the dots until years later, while watching “The Terminator” in a theater. It’s a small detail, but it makes the world feel richer and more interconnected.

    If I had one frustration, it would be that I still have no clear mental picture of Roland’s world beyond this endless beach filled with “lobstrosities.” I’m hoping that future books expand on the landscapes and settings beyond the harsh, surreal stretch of sand — first it was an unforgiving desert, then an endless beach. Still, Roland keeps me hooked: his instincts are always spot-on, his determination is absolute, and he remains one of the most compelling protagonists I’ve read.

    The last forty or so pages flew by, I couldn’t even take notes. Between Roland’s escape from Mort, Odetta and Detta finally merging into Susannah, and Roland securing the first two members of his ka-tet, the ending was thrilling. King manages to twist events in ways that surprise me without ever feeling implausible.

    Overall, I’d give this one 4.5 out of 5 stars (rounded up, as usual!) It’s an incredible continuation of the series, with new characters I’ve already grown attached to, gut-wrenching moments of loss, and just enough strangeness to keep me on edge. I love Eddie, I’m invested in Odetta/Detta/Susannah, and Roland remains as mysterious and magnetic as ever.

    Onward to the next door!

  • Stephen King’s The Gunslinger is such a strange little book, and I mean that in the best way possible. It’s often called the roughest of the Dark Tower series, even skippable, but I’m glad I didn’t listen to that advice. While it’s true that the style feels different from King’s usual work — more dreamlike, more biblical in tone — it serves as an important introduction to Roland, the man in black, and the world they inhabit. Without this entry point, the bigger themes that appear in the later books wouldn’t carry the same weight.

    What struck me first was how disorienting the setting was. On the surface, it feels like a classic Western: dusty towns, lonely deserts, and a stoic gunslinger chasing down an elusive enemy. But then you notice the speech patterns, which feel older, almost medieval, and out of nowhere someone mentions “Hey Jude.” That was the moment I realized this wasn’t just a simple frontier story, it’s an inter-dimensional place, something close to Earth but not quite. It took me maybe fifty pages before it clicked — their world seems to be stitched together from other worlds and time periods — but once I did, the book started to make sense.

    The structure itself is another level of strangeness. King uses stories within stories, characters retelling things that others told them, and it can get convoluted. Roland telling Brown a story about Alice, who had told him a story about herself, for example — it can be a little confusing to track who knows what and when, especially with multiple dimensions involved. But at the same time, it adds this mythical quality to the narrative, like you’re listening to a legend passed down, being reshaped with every retelling.

    Roland himself is fascinating, partly because of the little details King gives us. The moment he situates himself so perfectly by a campfire that the smoke never blows in his face — it’s a small thing, but it says everything about who he is. A man of control, precision, and survival. And then there’s Jake, a boy Roland finds along the way, who immediately feels too pure for such a harsh world. I had a bad feeling about him as soon as he appeared, and King never makes it easy. The line Jake speaks — “Go then, there are other worlds than these.” — is one of the best in the whole book, devastating in its simplicity, and it hits all the harder because you know what’s coming.

    The man in black, too, is an ominous presence throughout that when Roland finally catches up to him and their palaver ends with his death, it almost feels anticlimactic. Can a character that important, that evil, really be gone just like that? Somehow I doubt it. His shadow feels too big to vanish after one conversation.

    In the end, The Gunslinger feels less like a complete story and more like a fever dream of one, laying the groundwork for something much bigger. It’s confusing, yes, and not always as polished as King’s later writing, but it’s atmospheric and haunting in a way that stuck with me. It’s a short, strange book that hints at vast things to come, and even if it isn’t my favorite King, it makes me want to follow Roland further toward the Tower.

  • I thought I would really enjoy this concept — and maybe if I revisit it later, I’ll feel differently — but this time it just didn’t land the way I’d hoped. Telepathic and telekinetic children being kidnapped and tested on is a plot that should be right up my alley (hello, Stranger Things), but I found myself not as invested in the kids as I expected, and not as angry at the secret government agency behind it. The premise is strong, but the execution didn’t grab me the way King’s writing usually does. It reminded me of how I felt when reading The Tommyknockers — a cool idea, but I just wasn’t into it.

    That said, I did love how clever the kids are. There’s something so satisfying about watching them outsmart the adults. It makes me feel like I am right there with them, getting revenge for the terrible things done to them. And Avery Dixon? Absolute hero. M-O-O-N, that spells HERO. His storyline made me tear up more than once; a sweet child whose only problems should have been the vegetables he was required to eat for dinner, or the bullies at his school. Annie also had some great standout lines — “You’re in the south now…” hit especially hard — and I wish King had expanded upon her (I’m hoping she still pops up in a book I haven’t read yet)!

    One thing I couldn’t stop thinking about is how much the book would benefit from a visual adaptation. Sometimes King’s stories are easier to follow when given a cinematic treatment (Game of Thrones had the same effect for me). With so many kids, names, and processes happening at once, a TV version could really bring some clarity to moments like the transition to the Back Half or the unsettling “Stasi lights”.  I’ll definitely be checking out the MGM+ adaptation to see how it translates.

    As always, I admire King’s ability to ground the supernatural in a layer of realism. Even with kids wielding powers, he explains it in a way that feels plausible, scientific (BDNF testing at birth), and unnervingly possible. But his endings? They can be frustrating. With The Institute, the conclusion felt a bit rushed — 400+ pages of buildup followed by maybe 20 pages of resolution. It’s not bad, but it’s anticlimactic in that distinctly “King” way: well-rounded, but leaving me grumpy nonetheless.